We give each case the time and attention it deserves, and we treat everyone who walks through our doors like family.
From auto accidents to defective product injuries to workers’ compensation claims, we’re here to help Louisiana injury victims.
We value building relationships with the many people and organizations that make Louisiana a great place to live.
Dudley DeBosier has a trusted team of personal injury lawyers who have been helping injured people in Louisiana.
The Case Module Express 635, an innovative cotton picking machine that combines cotton picking and baling functionalities, was released in 2011 with the promise of providing farmers greater efficiency during the harvesting process. Instead, the Module Express has proven defective, presenting farmers with a host of problems that decrease efficiency and increase maintenance issues.
defective product attorneys at Dudley DeBosier are currently investigating
defective cotton picking machine lawsuits on behalf of farmers who used the
Module Express 635. If you owned or leased one of these machines between 2012
and 2017 and experienced problems, contact us today. You may be entitled to
significant compensation, and we’re ready to help you get the money you
Express was marketed as a cost-effective, revolutionary product that would
allow cotton farmers to streamline the harvesting process. By providing
on-board module building, the Module Express claimed it could do the work of
three different machines, thus reducing harvesting time as well as labor and
Manufactured by CNH Industrial America, LLC, one of the world’s leading manufacturers of farming and construction equipment, the more than $500,000 Module Express presents power, hydraulic, module building, and software problems. Instances of the machines shutting down mid-field and even catching fire have also been reported. Additionally, Case IH stopped manufacturing replacement parts, leaving farmers without a solution when their machines stopped working. If you owned or leased a Module Express 635 and experienced those or other problems, contact Dudley DeBosier today. We want to help.
Case IH’s longstanding competitor, John Deere, began developing similar
equipment around the same time, the Case Module Express 635 was released nearly
two years before John Deere’s 7760. Some plaintiffs believe that Case IH rushed
the Module Express to market in an effort to beat their competition and cut
down on production costs despite the machine’s defects. Case IH is now facing a
class action lawsuit on the grounds of rushing their product to market with
known defects and failing to disclose those defects to consumers.
At Dudley DeBosier, we don’t think it’s fair when big manufacturing companies make false claims about their products. If you owned or leased a defective Case Module Express 635 between 2012-2017, contact our Louisiana defective product attorneys today. We are currently investigating claims related to the Module Express, and we want to help you get the compensation you deserve. We’re available 24/7, and our case reviews are free. Contact us today to get started.
Dudley DeBosier is not associated with, sponsored by, or affiliated with Case IH, CNH Industrial America, LLC, or John Deere.
Cases may be referred to another attorney or law firm.